Standards conformance¶
rHEALPixDGGS implements code to both define an rHEALPix DGGS Reference System and to perform topological queries on its identifiers. The project’s roadmap is for version 1.0 to be fully compliant with OGC Abstract Specification Topic 21 version 2.0 (OGC 20-040r3) / ISO 19170-1:2020, Discrete Global Grid Systems — Part 1: Core Reference System and Operations, and Equal Area Earth Reference System.
The conformance target is the specification’s strongest conformance class, Equal-Area Earth DGGS, which comprises the Common Spatio-temporal Classes tests A.2, A.3 and A.5, all DGGS Core tests (A.6–A.19) and all Equal-Area Earth Reference System tests (A.20–A.29) of the specification’s Annex A. Every test in Annex A is of type Basic, assessed by inspection of the DGGS specification’s documentation — so this page is both the project’s self-assessment and, as the remaining rows are completed, the conformance documentation itself.
Scope notes:
The purely temporal tests A.1 and A.4 belong to the separate Spatio-temporal DGGS Core conformance class and are not required for a spatial DGGS; rHEALPixDGGS does not claim them.
The interoperation modules deliberately stop at the library boundary: rHEALPixDGGS provides query execution and standard-format serialization, while transport protocols (HTTP and friends, e.g. an OGC API — DGGS service) belong to software built on top of it.
Each row below records a status:
Met — the substance is implemented and stated here or in the linked API documentation.
Partial — implemented in substance, with named work remaining.
Planned — not yet implemented; the release target is named.
Common Spatio-temporal Classes¶
Test |
What it requires |
Status |
Evidence and plan |
|---|---|---|---|
A.2 zone geometry |
Zonal geometry and topology conforming to the common data model (zones with boundaries, neighborhoods and hierarchy). |
Partial |
|
A.3 spatial location |
Locations identified by reference to zones (ISO 19112 style). |
Partial |
|
A.5 RS using zonal identifiers |
A reference system whose zones carry unique identifiers, a parent/child hierarchy, an extent and a representative position. |
Partial |
Cell suids, |
DGGS Core — reference system¶
Test |
What it requires |
Status |
Evidence and plan |
|---|---|---|---|
A.6 harmonized model |
The reference system’s definition conforms to the Core data model (grids, refinement strategy, globe geometry). |
Partial |
All defining parameters live on
|
A.7 CRS |
A defined coordinate reference system, with coordinate-epoch provisions. |
Partial |
|
A.8 global domain |
A specified global domain and its dimensionality. |
Met |
The domain is the entire surface of the ellipsoid of revolution; spatial dimension 2, no temporal dimension. |
A.9 domain completeness |
The level 0 grid covers the entire global domain. |
Met |
The six resolution 0 cells (N, O, P, Q, R, S) partition the plane image of the projection, whose inverse covers the whole ellipsoid. |
A.10 location uniqueness |
Every location lies in exactly one level 0 cell. |
Met |
Cells own their upper and left boundaries;
|
A.11 simple cells |
Cells at every level are geometrically simple. |
Met |
All cells are simple polygons; on the ellipsoid they take one
of four shapes (quad, cap, dart, skew quad; see
|
A.12 direct position |
Every zone is assigned a direct position inside its boundary. |
Met |
The direct position is the centroid (A.27),
|
A.13 address |
Every zone has a globally unique identifier, structured on a recognized indexing method. |
Met |
Suids are hierarchy-based (resolution 0 letter plus one base- N_side² digit per refinement); uniqueness is structural. A formal grammar is to be published with A.5 (v1.0). |
A.14 discrete global grid |
Grids defined as the aggregation of all cells at one level. |
Met |
|
A.15 grid sequence |
The grid hierarchy is ordered by increasing refinement. |
Met |
Resolutions are the integers 0 through max_resolution; every API is indexed by them. |
DGGS Core — functions¶
Test |
What it requires |
Status |
Evidence and plan |
|---|---|---|---|
A.16 quantization |
Defined operations assigning external data to cells, conforming to the quantization model. |
Partial |
Vector quantization exists:
|
A.17 zone queries |
The full DE-9IM query interface between zones: contains, within, touches, disjoint, equals, intersects, overlaps, crosses, plus distance and relative position. |
Met |
Every operation and attribute of Table 53 is implemented. The
DE-9IM and one-dimensional operations are methods of
|
A.18 interoperation query |
Operations to read, interpret and execute external data queries. |
Partial |
External geometries (Shapely/WKT) are accepted as queries by
|
A.19 interoperation broadcast |
Operations translating query results into standard data formats for delivery. |
Met |
|
Equal-Area Earth Reference System¶
Test |
What it requires |
Status |
Evidence and plan |
|---|---|---|---|
A.20 harmonized model |
The EAERS definition conforms to the Equal-Area data model. |
Partial |
Substance as per A.6; the formal declaration (including the grid-constraint list with cellEquiSized first) is to be written (v1.0). |
A.21 global domain |
The domain is the whole Earth-model surface and the equal-size cell constraint is declared. |
Partial |
The domain is the whole ellipsoid surface (A.8); the formal cellEquiSized declaration rides with A.20 (v1.0). |
A.22 initial tessellation |
An initial grid of equal-area cells produced by mapping the faces of a base polyhedron to the Earth model. |
Met |
The six cube faces map to the six resolution 0 cells through the rHEALPix projection; their areas are exactly equal by the projection’s equal-area property. |
A.23 tessellation sequence |
Tessellation operations generating progressively finer grids. |
Met |
Each cell subdivides into N_side² congruent planar children;
|
A.24 sequence maximum |
A declared limit on refinement iterations tied to the cell-area error budget. |
Partial |
|
A.25 global area preservation |
Domain completeness and position uniqueness preserved at every level (dynamic-datum form). |
Met |
WGS84 is a dynamic datum; completeness and uniqueness hold at every level by the subdivision construction (A.9, A.10 apply per level). |
A.26 cells are simple 2D polygons |
Every EAERS cell is a simple polygon. |
Met |
As A.11; the boundary-curve types per cell shape are to be described alongside the GML work (v1.0). |
A.27 direct position is the centroid |
Each cell’s direct position is its centroid, the geodesic center of surface area. |
Met |
Requirement 27: “the DirectPosition of an EA_Cell [is] the
centroid of the EA_cell, computed as the geodesic centre of
surface area”, and its test “requires verification that the
attribute EA_Zone(centroid) returns a direct position on the
surface of the cell”. |
A.28 area error budget |
A declared cell-area error budget of at most 1% per grid. |
Partial |
|
A.29 equal-area cells |
Cells in each grid are equal-area within the declared budget. |
Met |
Planar cell areas are exactly equal at each resolution, and the projection is equal-area onto the ellipsoid; verified by the area tests in the test suite (budgets published under A.28). |
Planned work by release¶
v0.9.0 — the zone-query interface is complete (intersects, crosses, distance, withinDistance, relativePosition, relatePosition, relate: #96; DE-9IM semantics for
overlaps: #97) the centroid is the published representative position (#98), zones and query results export to GeoJSON and delimited text (#99), and the hierarchy predicates, zone-set operations and query attributes of Table 53 are in place (#161).v1.0 — finish this page’s remaining rows: CRS definitions (WKT2/PROJJSON) with epoch statement (#100), the zonal identifier grammar (#101), the published error-budget and maximum-resolution derivation (#102), GML export with its application schema (#103), and the formal reference-system declaration with the quantization and interoperation mapping documentation (#104).
Progress is tracked in the project’s GitHub milestones.